Sat, October 29, 2016

Race 5

Stewards inquiry and jockey’s objection # 8 Completely Bonkers (Irad Ortiz Jr.) against #3 Pirellone (Tyler Gaffalione) for alleged interference approaching the 1/16 pole. #3 Pirellone drifts out under left hand crop in front of #8 Completely Bonkers with sufficient clearance. After speaking to the riders involved and viewing  all video angles it was determined that no further action was warranted. The order of finish. 3.6.8.11

With regard to interference, New York is a “Category 2” state, meaning that Commission rules provide that if the interferer is guilty of causing interference and such interference in the judgment of the Stewards has altered the finish of the race, then the interferer is placed behind the offended horse.

The Stewards consider whether the riders of the horse or horses that are offended continue to give effort to the finish of the race.

The Stewards also consider whether the offending jockey acted in a willful or careless manner while interfering with another horse or jockey, for which the interferer may be disqualified, i.e., placed last or unplaced in the order of finish. For example, if an offending jockey acts in a dangerous manner, exhibits extremely improper riding or impedes several horses, the Stewards may disqualify the offending horse without regard to the specific effect of the foul on the order of finish.

For more information, see Commission rule 4035.2 (“Riding foul penalized)

Race 6 

Jockeys objection from the #5 Harlan’s Harmony (Angel Arroyo)against the # 3 Bonus Points (John Velazquez)for alleged interference in the stretch. The #5 steadies for a brief moment and chooses to go around the # 3 instead of inside of him who floated in slightly. After reviewing the video and speaking to the riders involved the claim of foul is disallowed and the race is official as is. The order of finish is 2-7-3-6

With regard to interference, New York is a “Category 2” state, meaning that Commission rules provide that if the interferer is guilty of causing interference and such interference in the judgment of the Stewards has altered the finish of the race, then the interferer is placed behind the offended horse.

The Stewards consider whether the riders of the horse or horses that are offended continue to give effort to the finish of the race.

The Stewards also consider whether the offending jockey acted in a willful or careless manner while interfering with another horse or jockey, for which the interferer may be disqualified, i.e., placed last or unplaced in the order of finish. For example, if an offending jockey acts in a dangerous manner, exhibits extremely improper riding or impedes several horses, the Stewards may disqualify the offending horse without regard to the specific effect of the foul on the order of finish.

For more information, see Commission rule 4035.2 (“Riding foul penalized)